.
The report is based on an independent study conducted
in August 2018 with three global stakeholder groups
– healthcare professionals (HCP), pharmaceutical
companies (pharma) and third party service providers.
In combination, their insights indicate that:
For HCPs, websites are the most important and
frequently used of communication channels in clinical
practice, while pharma still places more value and
budget with other channels including scientific meetings
and company representatives.
HCPs turn to pharma websites for brand awareness,
however for disease awareness they prefer to use
independent websites and expect industry to support
the provision of these. Pharma however, prefers to use
its own websites for both brand and disease awareness,
and most companies have internal policies to favour
investment in their own websites.
Pharma’s primary objectives for digital activities are to
provide real value, improve trust and grow audience
reach. To do this, focus is on creating the types and
formats of content that HCPs prefer. Creating this
content is a major challenge that pharma largely
outsources to overcome. The potential of this content to
achieve pharma’s objectives is then limited by placing it
on their own websites.
While multichannel activity is a major area of focus and
challenge for industry, the channels that pharma adopts
to engage HCPs are not being effectively integrated with
websites or successfully used to raise awareness of
them. Likewise, data collection and use is a key area of
focus but also a major challenge, with pharma struggling
to extract meaningful insight or measure real-world
impact currently.
Pharma is collaborating with third party providers in the
areas that it finds challenging internally due to perceived
lack of expertise, but research indicates pharma
preference would be to keep most digital activity
internally driven and resourced (Más)
martes, 21 de mayo de 2019
Suscribirse a:
Enviar comentarios (Atom)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario